Author Archive

Re: Chicago Tribune Article

Sunday, August 2nd, 2009

Correction: The statement “Charles Mason Remey, then in his 90s, said Effendi had addressed him in letters as his son or spiritual descendant.” is not the teaching of the Orthodox Baha’is. Instead, they believe that Shoghi Effendi appointed Mason Remey as the second Guardian in conformity with the Will and Testament of Abdu’l-Baha, when he appointed Remey as the President of the embryonic Universal House of Justice he called the International Baha’i Council. Jeffrey

Re: Chicago Tribune Article

Sunday, August 2nd, 2009

Kendra,

This article describes the Orthodox Baha’i as a “tiny band of believers”.
Also, Jesus, at first, had 12 disciples. While their numbers are few, the Orthodox Baha’is try to follow the truth and share it with others. If the numbers are so insignificant, why is the larger group so bent on suing them? Janice

Re: Chicago Tribune Article

Sunday, August 2nd, 2009

The Chicago Tribune does not get to the heart of the matter, which is that the Baha’i scriptures very clearly state, in explicit terms, who would have the auhority of succession in the Baha’i Faith. Mason Remey did not fill the qualifications by any measure and those who followed him have no just claim on the marks and institutional names of the Baha’i Faith. The “Orthodox Baha’is” and one or two other miniscule groups (probably fewer than 100 people each) deliberately attempt to confuse Baha’is and others through internet sites and postings wherein they misrepresent themselves as if they were ostensibly the Baha’i Faith. It is this group itself which launched a number of lawsuits to attempt to get courts to give them title to Baha’i poperties around the country, despite clear documentation to the contrary. Any fair-minded investigator who reviews the entire record of these groups will see that it is the “Orthodox Baha’is” who are not standing on firm ground. Will

Re: Chicago Tribune Article

Sunday, August 2nd, 2009

This article makes it seem as if the Orthodox Baha’is have many followers. However, their numbers barely reach 100. This is clearly not a great schism as the article claims. In all of the monotheistic religions where divisions occurred among sects, thousands initially followed these sects. If you want to cite Protestantism, they now number in the millions! As such, one cannot compare Orthodox Baha’is with cataclysmic sects. Kendra M.

Re: Chicago Tribune Article

Sunday, August 2nd, 2009

The Baha’i faith is not a sect of Islam, it is an independent religion. Anonymous

Chicago Tribune Article

Sunday, August 2nd, 2009

Archive for Monday, May 18, 2009
Baha’i rift: Baha’is upset with Orthodox Baha’i Faith
Mainstream group doesn’t want the name Baha’i by any other group

By Manya A Brachear
May 18, 2009

Every religion has been riven by struggles over authority and authenticity.

Buddhism began when a maverick Hindu prince inspired disciples to embrace asceticism. Judaism has sprouted branches from ultra-orthodox to ultra-liberal, even Jews for Jesus. Christianity went through numerous profound splits, including the Protestant Reformation sparked in the 16th Century by Martin Luther in Germany and the 19th Century Mormon movement led by Joseph Smith in the U.S.

Now the Baha’i Faith, the organization representing the most recent sect to spring from Islam, is struggling to defend its identity in federal court in Chicago, where North American Baha’is have been based ever since believers came to the U.S. about 90 years ago. They contend that a tiny band of believers known as the Orthodox Baha’i Faith can’t call themselves Baha’i or use one of its key symbols without violating trademark law or a previous court ruling more than 40 years ago.

In the hands of the federal 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, the case could set a precedent for settling religious schisms, doctrinal disputes and claims to truth.

“The word Baha’i carries with it implications for a certain sets of beliefs – and we have to protect that,” said Robert Stockman, a practicing Baha’i and religious studies instructor at DePaul University.

Adherents of the Orthodox Baha’i Faith believe the international community has strayed from the religion’s original teachings. That deviation, they say, threatens to interfere with God’s plan for the world.

Bahá’u’lláh, who founded the faith in Iran in the mid-19th Century, is regarded by Baha’is as the most recent messenger of God in a long line including Abraham, Buddha, Krishna, Jesus and Muhammad. Baha’is believe Bahá’u’lláh revealed God’s plan by which humanity one day would unite to become a single race.

On a Web site called www.truebahai.com, the orthodox group faults the mainstream denomination for corrupting that plan.

The mainstream Baha’is have responded with a lawsuit that tries to bar the orthodox from calling themselves Baha’i and sharing the “The Greatest Name,” a sacred and trademarked symbol. Baha’is believe they are not only safeguarding their identity. They are defending the truth with a capital T.

The Orthodox say that is not a matter for the courts to decide.

“We’re the true faith. That’s what we would say,” said Jeffrey Goldberg, a member of the Orthodox Baha’i Faith who left Chicago to be closer to an Orthodox community in New Mexico. “That has to be decided in the hearts and minds of the Baha’i, not by a secular court order.”

The Baha’is first took breakaway believers to court in 1966 after a tumultuous time for their community. Nine years earlier, Shoghi Effendi, guardian of the faith and direct descendant of the founding prophet, had died unexpectedly and allegedly without naming a successor.

Leaders decided a Universal House of Justice envisioned by Effendi would oversee the faith. But shortly after the leaders announced their solution, one of them declared that Effendi actually had intended for him to serve as the next guardian.

Charles Mason Remey, then in his 90s, said Effendi had addressed him in letters as his son or spiritual descendant.

The National Assembly of France and about 100 others followed Remey. But the rest of the Baha’i community declared Remey a covenant breaker, expelled him from the faith and successfully sued his followers, barring them from calling themselves Baha’i and using the sacred symbol. Remey’s group disbanded, but orthodox believers reorganized and continued to maintain the guardianship.

Thirty years later, Goldberg, an active Baha’i in Barrington, came upon the splinter group while surfing the Internet. He became convinced that he had been duped.

With no explanation, Goldberg quietly resigned from the community because he knew the consequences. When Bahai’s are declared covenant breakers, they are shunned or ostracized with the exception of business relations.

But Janice Franco wouldn’t let Goldberg go that easily.

She insisted on knowing why he left and, when he told her, went on a quest to prove him wrong. After plunging herself into Baha’i literature, Franco discovered Goldberg might have a point.

Indeed, both Goldberg and Franco were declared covenant breakers and shunned. Goldberg’s wife was encouraged to divorce her husband. Franco’s home-schooled children lost a number of friends. To this day, they are wary of organized religion.

“It was devastating news to find out the larger group had strayed,” Franco said. “I want to follow the truth. I don’t want to support a mistake.

“The consequence is I don’t have a community.”

Then in 2006, the mainstream Baha’is filed a lawsuit, accusing the orthodox believers of violating the court order issued 40 years earlier.

The Orthodox Baha’is insist they aren’t the same group. They also say a religious denomination can’t trademark truth. The term Baha’i refers to a follower of Bahá’u’lláh. That applies to him and other Orthodox Baha’i, he said.

“From our point of view, if you believe in Christ you can use the word Christ in your name,” Goldberg said. “It’s a little bit like asking you to recant your faith. It’s unacceptable to us.”

But Stockman said it is the religion’s responsibility to protect the Baha’i name.

“Baha’is are told again and again to try to exercise discipline on what they say about their faith and don’t confuse the public. … We have our own community to build,” he said.

There are 5 million Baha’is in the world – 150,000 in the U.S., including 2,000 in the Chicago area. Why the mainstream denomination waited four decades to enforce the court ruling is a mystery. Baha’i leaders declined interview requests.

Barring the Orthodox believers from using the name “Baha’i” prevents them from popping up in Google when users type in that term.

Stockman said the Web is a tricky place to have conversations about spiritual truth.

“It’s not our desire to convert people. It’s our desire to put our material out there for people to know what the truth is and decide themselves.”

mbrachear@tribune.com

Fireside 7: Revelation

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

In the final Fireside, all of the previous studies are incorporated and demonstrated within the Establisher of the Baha’i Faith’s explanation and commentary on the Book of Revelation from the New Testament of the Holy Bible. During the course of this absolutely authoritative work, the complete spectrum of all areas of knowledge is incorporated and the time line of Past, Present and Future is brought to a single point of understanding and focus. In addition to this the sum of all the six earlier Firesides is enfolded into the Establisher’s Explanations and commentaries.

Fireside 7 completes the Fireside series. With the Firesides as the basic education, the world will know the unity of all Religions, Sciences, and areas of human study and endeavor. With this as the foundation of Universal Public Education, all will be assured of a common point of reference and the integration of all study and research will bring all people out of the darkness of ignorance.

Fireside 6: Great Pyramid Proofs

Monday, February 9th, 2009

The Sixth Fireside illustrates the Baha’i Basic Principal that “True Science and True Religion Must Correspond”. It illuminates the scientific proofs for the authenticity of the Nine Manifestations of God who were sent to mankind to deliver a progressive revelation for the continuing advancement of human civilization.

In this Fireside there are pathways into the study of Anthropology, Archeology, Architecture, Astronomy, Engineering, Geology, Geography, History, Mathematics, and Metallurgy to name a few.

Through the course of this Fireside the seeker is required to learn the measurements of the structures which comprise the Great Pyramid of Giza (The Bible in Stone) and how those measurements in arithmetical formulas show the fulfillment of Biblical Time Prophecies and significant historical events recorded in the Bible and other records. Geology is used to show how the very types of rock used in the construction of the entire Great Pyramid of Giza pertain to the prophecies for all the Manifestations of God over the past 6000 years. The Geology of the Great Pyramid of Giza also confirms western hemisphere Pre-Columbian Native American History, Prophecy and Science. The patterns of construction in the various sections of the Great Pyramid of Giza are also shown to bear out a wealth of scientific data which only the greatest scientific research efforts of the past century have been able to approach.

Fireside 5: Proofs for the Establisher

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

The fifth Fireside, in giving forth the proofs for the Establisher of the Baha’i Faith requires the seeker to draw upon everything learned in the previous four Firesides. It includes the utilization of the scientific method employed in the application of the Golden Criteria to determine how prophecy has been fulfilled by one specific individual in all of history whom Bahai’s know as the Establisher. Once again, these four criteria are: 1. proof by Name, 2. proof by Date, 3. proof by Address, 4. proof by Mission.

While this is the lesson of this Fireside; that the Establisher of the Baha’i Faith has come fulfilling Prophecy, it teaches lessons on many other levels. Some of the lessons of this Fireside have to do with justice and injustice and profound perseverance in the face of seemingly overwhelming opposition. It also clearly illustrates how prophecy is fulfilled in the current day and is not confined to history.

All of the research required in the first three firesides which involve researching Biblical texts are employed within this Fireside and this research now expands to the Baha’i texts as well.

Fireside 4: The Covenant

Saturday, December 27th, 2008

The fourth Fireside is an explanation of the Covenant. The Covenant is the binding agreement or understanding between God and His creation on many levels. It is the primal contract. It is in effect and established immutably between God and all of nature, between God and His Promised Ones, and between God and all of humanity collectively as well as individually. It is not my purpose to delve into the universality or intricacies of God’s Covenant in this forum. That can begin with the seeker being guided through the Covenant Fireside itself, followed by personal exploration, meditation and reflection without limit within the depths of the Baha’i sacred writings.

The Covenant Fireside itself is the explanation of the book of Baha’u’llah’s Covenant and the Will and Testament of Abdu’l-Baha specifically. An understanding of these documents shows the seeker the Divine origination of all areas of human thought and endeavor concerning law and justice. Through the Covenant Fireside one begins to understand that all human efforts at unity, and civilization and all that those ideals imply and encompass have their inspiration in God’s Covenant, even without conscious human awareness of it. It also requires the seeker to reflect back upon and draw from the three previous Firesides and enables them to see the continuity of the will and purpose of God working throughout every age and epoch of the life of His creation and in the life of the seeker personally.